who decides where that distinction is? isn't it dangerous for a person to bebrowsing an arms website? and at the same time isn't it legal? Who determines what I do is threatening befor eits too late? is there a preemptive move to ensure the things we do are not going to harm other people without abusing the police powers of the state?
Trusting human judgment hasn't exactly helped the world 100%. Who can you watch? just questions with no answers unfortunately
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
A trip to Pennsylvania
I finally got out of William and Mary this Semester for a short trip.
Visited Abby in Bucknell. Its a small University in Lewisburg, PA but nice
It was the first snow I've seen all season and it was definitely a welcome sight. We spent time with coffee movies, the mall, and some good ol' applebees. I'm a romantic.
I miss it. That's about the most important thing I can tell you.
Just a great weekend I suppose.
--J.T.
Visited Abby in Bucknell. Its a small University in Lewisburg, PA but nice
It was the first snow I've seen all season and it was definitely a welcome sight. We spent time with coffee movies, the mall, and some good ol' applebees. I'm a romantic.
I miss it. That's about the most important thing I can tell you.
Just a great weekend I suppose.
--J.T.
Monday, February 11, 2008
on the subject of Net Neutrality
More importantly it seems is Net "EQUALITY!"
Cross Country High Speed, that's a goal for the future that really depends on time. The current Internet however, should be the same speed for all sites. Granted, streaming a video that's an hour long will take longer than a .gif animation but really, when youtube loads at different speeds depending on my home computer (provided by cox) or the school laptop, I feel that there has been considerable gippage to coin a phrase.
Anyway, I'm not sure what AT&T lobbyists are accomplishing, but if they can monopolize our market I want to see some smart people on the public's side fighting to get us three generations caught up with Denmark, the Nokia N70 still costs $400 dollars stateside and Nokia is in the P series now I believe, I'm going to go ahead and call bullshit on that.
speaking of cell phones, why do we still lose service in places next to a freaking tower? just saying.
--J.T.
Cross Country High Speed, that's a goal for the future that really depends on time. The current Internet however, should be the same speed for all sites. Granted, streaming a video that's an hour long will take longer than a .gif animation but really, when youtube loads at different speeds depending on my home computer (provided by cox) or the school laptop, I feel that there has been considerable gippage to coin a phrase.
Anyway, I'm not sure what AT&T lobbyists are accomplishing, but if they can monopolize our market I want to see some smart people on the public's side fighting to get us three generations caught up with Denmark, the Nokia N70 still costs $400 dollars stateside and Nokia is in the P series now I believe, I'm going to go ahead and call bullshit on that.
speaking of cell phones, why do we still lose service in places next to a freaking tower? just saying.
--J.T.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
